OneWorld South Asia Home Global Headlines Global aid: Top donors falter in ensuring transparency
OneWorld South Asia OneWorld Network OneWorld South Asia
24 May 2012
Welcome to OneWorld South Asia! We bring together a network of people and groups working on human rights and sustainable development.
 
OWSA Group Websites
Governance Knowledge Centre
EK duniya anEK awaaz
Climate Change Action
Appropriate Technology Choices
Digital Opportunity Channel
Lifelines
The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act
 
Collaborative Projects

Global aid: Top donors falter in ensuring transparency

Bookmark 
and Share
24 May 2011
 

Top multilateral and bi-lateral donors including the United Nations Development Programme(UNDP) and World Food Programme(WFP) rank the lowest in aid transparency, according to a new report. The research was based on reporting by the aid agencies and access to donor information.

aid-transparency.jpg
Some donors are still reluctant to share financial information say analysts/ Photo credit: Auntie P/ Flickr
Dakar:  Norway, Sweden, Finland and several UN agencies including the World Food Programme, the UN Population Fund, and the UN Development Programme (UNDP) rank among the lowest out of 42 bilateral and multilateral donors measured for aid transparency, according to just-published research by New York University Economics Professor William Easterly and Claudia Williamson.

The US Agency for International Development (USAID) and the UK Department for International Development (DFID) scored highest.

Researchers measured transparency by analysing donor reporting data to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Development Assistance Committee (OECD-DAC); publicly available information; how fully donors responded to direct requests for information concerning how many people they employed; their administrative costs; salaries and benefits; and total development assistance disbursed.

Finland, Norway and Sweden were found to be poor on data sharing. UNDP fared worst partly because it published no information online, nor would it respond to any requests for information.

Williamson recognized it is hard to accurately measure transparency of all donors, but stressed that nevertheless their findings show progress on donor transparency is moving too slowly.

Contradictory findings

Sweden fares far better - coming third top after Denmark and the UK - in a separate assessment of aid effectiveness of European donors, undertaken by Aidwatch. In this case, Aidwatch assessed the availability of 35 types of information at organizational, partner country, and project level.

In the Aidwatch analysis, France, the EU’s second largest aid donor, came bottom alongside Hungary, Greece and Poland.

Four European donors - Denmark, the European Commission, Finland and the Netherlands - have agreed to join the UK in meeting the aid transparency standard set by the International Aid Transparency Initiative, by the end of 2011. The goal entails making aid spend information easier to access, use and understand.

The World Bank just became the first multilateral to attain this goal.

Donors will discuss aid transparency challenges when they meet in Busan, South Korea, at the fourth annual aid effectiveness forum at the end of 2011. 

As part of an accountability drive in 2005, donors promised to open up their financial flows and policies for greater scrutiny, by signing the Paris Declaration on aid effectiveness.

 
Source : IRIN
Personal tools
Log in
Supported by:
JICA DFID HIVOS SDC