OneWorld South Asia Home Today's Headlines Indian court disapproves of anti-corruption stir
OneWorld South Asia OneWorld Network OneWorld South Asia
25 May 2012
Welcome to OneWorld South Asia! We bring together a network of people and groups working on human rights and sustainable development.
 
OWSA Group Websites
Governance Knowledge Centre
EK duniya anEK awaaz
Climate Change Action
Appropriate Technology Choices
Digital Opportunity Channel
Lifelines
The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act
 
Collaborative Projects

Indian court disapproves of anti-corruption stir

Bookmark 
and Share
23 December 2011
 

Bombay High Court has rejected anti-graft campaigner Anna Hazare's plea to alot public ground on concessional rates for the campaign.

Mumbai: In a setback to Team Anna, the Bombay high court on Friday rejected its petition for direction to the Maharashtra government for allotting MMRDA ground for free or at concessional rates for Anna Hazare's fast, saying it cannot come to the conclusion if the agitation was in public interest or politically motivated.

anna_hazare_protest_flag.jpg

The court also said it cannot direct the government to open the gates to the enclosed area in Azad Maidan, another probable venue for the proposed 3-day fast from December 27, to allow Team Anna larger space for the protest.

"We are afraid that such issues cannot be decided by the court. This court cannot come to the conclusion as to whether this agitation is in public interest or politically motivated," a division bench of Justices P B Majmudar and Mridula Bhatkar observed while rejecting the petition filed by Jagrut Nagrik Manch, an affiliate of Hazare's India Against Corruption.

"It cannot be said that the petitioners have undertaken a national event for the MMRDA to exempt them from rent for the ground," Justice Majmudar said.

The court said another ground for rejecting the plea was that the petitioner was not a registered social organisation, a mandatory requirement for seeking concession from MMRDA.

When Mahendra Ghelani, advocate for the petitioner, told the court that they would file another application to MMRDA through a registered organisation, the court said they could do that and the state-run body shall consider it on merit and according to their discretion.

 
Personal tools
Log in
Supported by:
JICA DFID HIVOS SDC